AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

TL;DR

Buying for a business?Offer from Amazon

Get business pricing on tech for your team

  • Business-only prices and quantity discounts
  • Tax-exempt purchasing
  • Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Sam Altman testified that Elon Musk once proposed passing control of OpenAI to his children. This revelation emerges amid Musk’s lawsuit challenging OpenAI’s corporate structure. The development raises questions about Musk’s influence over OpenAI’s direction.

Sam Altman testified on May 12, 2026, that Elon Musk once suggested passing control of OpenAI to his children, a proposal that raises questions about Musk’s influence over the company’s future and governance amid a lawsuit challenging OpenAI’s structure.

During a court hearing in the lawsuit filed by Musk against OpenAI, Altman revealed that Musk, during a 2017 discussion, expressed the idea that OpenAI should pass to his children if he died while controlling the company. Altman described this as a ‘hair-raising’ moment, citing Musk’s focus on maintaining control as a concern for the founders.

Altman explained that Musk’s emphasis on controlling the for-profit arm of OpenAI prompted skepticism, given the organization’s commitment to avoiding concentration of AI power in a single individual. He also noted that Musk’s management style was not well-suited to research environments, citing instances of demotivation among researchers and management conflicts.

Despite their disagreements, Altman maintained that Musk was kept informed about OpenAI’s developments and was involved in some investment discussions, including a 2018 meeting with Microsoft, which Altman described as a positive encounter where Musk engaged informally.

Why It Matters

This testimony matters because it sheds light on Musk’s potential influence over OpenAI’s governance and hints at his long-term interests in controlling the organization. It also raises questions about the integrity of OpenAI’s nonprofit mission amid Musk’s competing AI ventures and legal disputes, impacting perceptions of governance and control in the AI industry.

Amazon

AI research lab management books

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Background

Elon Musk was a co-founder of OpenAI in 2015 but stepped back from active management after conflicts with other founders, notably Altman. Musk’s departure from the board and subsequent AI initiatives at Tesla and his startup xAI have raised questions about his ongoing influence. The lawsuit, filed by Musk, challenges the company’s structure and governance, with claims that the nonprofit foundation’s assets and control were misused or misrepresented. Altman’s testimony provides insight into internal discussions from the early days of OpenAI, revealing Musk’s focus on control and safety concerns.

“Musk said, ‘Maybe OpenAI should pass to my children.'”

— Sam Altman

“He had demotivated some of our most key researchers. He required Greg and Ilya to make a list of accomplishments and take a chainsaw through a bunch. That did huge damage to the culture.”

— Sam Altman

“During the 2018 Microsoft meeting, Musk spent a long conversation showing us memes on his phone. It was a good vibes meeting.”

— Sam Altman

Amazon

corporate governance books for AI companies

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

What Remains Unclear

It remains unclear how seriously Musk’s suggestion was considered or whether he intended to follow through with passing control to his children. The full scope of Musk’s influence over OpenAI’s governance and how this proposal fits into his broader plans is still uncertain. Additionally, the implications of this revelation for the ongoing lawsuit are not yet fully clear.

Amazon

AI ethics and safety books

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

What’s Next

Legal proceedings will continue as Musk’s lawsuit challenges OpenAI’s corporate structure and governance. Further testimonies and evidence may clarify Musk’s influence and intentions, and potential court rulings could impact OpenAI’s future governance and ownership structure.

Amazon

AI startup management tools

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Key Questions

Did Elon Musk ever formally propose passing control of OpenAI to his children?

Altman testified that Musk suggested this idea during a 2017 discussion, but it is not clear if it was a formal proposal or a casual remark.

What does this revelation mean for Musk’s influence over OpenAI?

It suggests Musk was interested in maintaining control over OpenAI’s future, which could influence perceptions of his ongoing involvement and the company’s governance structure.

How might this affect the ongoing lawsuit?

The court may consider Musk’s intentions and influence as part of the case, potentially impacting rulings on governance and asset control.

Will Musk’s proposal impact OpenAI’s nonprofit status?

This remains uncertain; the lawsuit and Altman’s testimony focus on governance and control issues, but any implications for nonprofit status are yet to be determined.

FALL

Fall Picks

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

You May Also Like

SenseTime’s Vision AI Breakthroughs Earn Worldwide Recognition

SenseTime reports its vision AI ranked first worldwide in three categories, though details and independent verification are currently unavailable.

The haves and have nots of the AI gold rush

Amid the AI industry surge, roughly 10,000 industry insiders have amassed over $20M, highlighting growing wealth disparities and industry uncertainty.

AI in Consulting and Professional Services: Changing Client Work

AI in consulting is revolutionizing client work, but understanding its full impact is essential to navigate the future effectively.

The Ultimate Buyer’s Guide To Mistral Forge In AI Applications

A new buyer guide says Mistral Forge fits only organizations with sovereignty, reasoning, security and data-readiness requirements.